|
|
 |



|
| |
| Provider
Services |
EHR Implementation, Integration and Administration
 |
Architected EHR Solution |
- Built to adapt to internal processes
- Talks to third party systems, currently used by the clinics
- User's involved from system conception
and design, creates ownership and
acceptance
- Higher initial cost but no license cost
- Makes sense only when a large number of captive clinics are involved
|
|
| Standard Boxed EHR software |
 |
- Built to accommodate multiple process logic in industry. Clinics have to adapt to that
- May have open interfaces but less likely to accommodate all third party software in clinics. Also involves future integration cost
- Lower initial cost, but high licensing fee
- Data migration major challenge sometimes
- Upgrades expensive
|
|
- Using core components of FQHC-specific EHR and customizing to make it cost-effective and still flexible
- Any group with more than $15M in annual revenue has critical mass to tailor a EHR
- User involvement in development phase => acceptance and ownership
- Need not accommodate all PM systems except the ones used by group clinics
- Lower initial cost than 'pure build',
lower subscription than 'pure buy'.
- Better negotiating power if all clinics use the same software.
|
 |
|
R Systems, developed integrated systems for the State Govts since more than 15 years
|
- Created online solution to implement
Megan's Law for CA Dept. of Justice
- Created online Medi-Cal eligibility and optical ordering system for CA prisons
- Currently implementing major projects for
 Dept. of Health
 Dept. of Social Services,
 Dept. of Fair Employment,
 Dept. of General Services
- Built PM, EHR, HIPAA transaction systems for several private healthcare
product companies
- Certified Level-5 in CMM; highest level in among software technology firms
|
|
|
|
|
|